Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

• Next message: Andrew Brink: "Re: Getting Out of Memory errors at random intervals."
• Previous message: Jim Studt: "Re: Problem with ServerWorks CNB20LE and lost interrupts"
• Next in thread: Robert Lowery: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday, 13. January 2002 17:56, yodaiken wrote:
> > He later said he did in fact build the same tree, from the same initial
> > condition, in single user mode, etc etc ... sounded like good testing
> > methodology to me.
>
> Really? You think that
> unpack a tar archive
> make
>
> is a repeatable benchmark?

Do it tree times and send the geometric middle. Where's the problem?
Even with disk fragmentation. Maybe use an empty disk...

What about latencytest0.42-png?
We used it even before Ingo's O(1) existed.
Were can I find your latency test? Link?

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Brink: "Re: Getting Out of Memory errors at random intervals."
• Previous message: Jim Studt: "Re: Problem with ServerWorks CNB20LE and lost interrupts"
• Next in thread: Robert Lowery: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:42 EST