On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > overall performance seems far lower. For instance, without the patch
> > the -j build finishes in ~10 minutes (2x933P3/256MB) but with the patch
>
> please, PLEASE stop using "make -j"
> for anything except the fork-bomb that it is.
> pretending that it's a benchmark, especially one
> to guide kernel tuning, is a travesty!
Actually, it's as good a benchmark as any. Knowing
how well the system is able to recover from heavy
overload situations is useful to know if your
server gets heavily overloaded at times.
If one VM falls over horribly under half the load
it takes to make another VM go slower, I know which
one I'd want on my server.
> if you want to simulate VM load, so something sane like
> boot with mem=32M, or a simple "mmap(lots); mlockall" tool.
... and then you come up with something WAY less
realistic than 'make -j' ;)))
cheers,
Rik
--
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:37 EST