Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 10:22:48 EST


> Unfortunately it wasn't a simple "replace global irq with spinlocks" - some
> code also got moved around so its not clear that the problem was fixed by
> the spinlocks or the code reordering. I'd rather know which it was.

The code re-ordering fixes the bug. The spinlocks are an unrelated change
that belong in a seperate diff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:35 EST