Re: [PATCH] minor sched-E1 tweaks and questions

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 22:48:42 EST


In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201091126520.2276-100000@localhost.localdomain> you
write:
> > Q. How can this happen in expire_task():
> > if (p->array != rq->active) {
> > p->need_resched = 1;
> > return;
> > }
>
> if a task gets delayed by some really heavy IRQ load and the timer
> interrupt hits the task twice.

Hmm... still don't see it. update_process_times() surely doesn't
re-enter? And another CPU cannot load_balance() p (== current) away
from us.

Another question:

        if (likely(prev != next)) {
                rq->nr_switches++;
                rq->curr = next;
                next->cpu = prev->cpu;
                context_switch(prev, next);
                /*
                 * The runqueue pointer might be from another CPU
                 * if the new task was last running on a different
                 * CPU - thus re-load it.
                 */
                barrier();
                rq = this_rq();
        }
        spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);

I do not understand this comment. How can rq (ie. smp_processor_id())
change? Nothing sleeps here, and if it DID change, the
spin_unlock_irq() would be wrong...

> i've taken your fixes, please double-check the next patch whether all of
> them are correctly applied.

Um, missed one:

 static struct runqueue {
- int cpu;
         spinlock_t lock;
- unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches, last_rt_event;
+ unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches;
         task_t *curr, *idle;
         prio_array_t *active, *expired, arrays[2];
- char __pad [SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
+ int prev_nr_running[NR_CPUS];
 } runqueues [NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;

You want each entry in the array to be aligned, not the whole array!
You need to define the struct runqueue to be the cacheline aligned
(using ____cacheline_aligned since it's a type), THEN put the
__cacheline_aligned after the array declaration so it gets put in the
aligned section:

 struct runqueue {
         spinlock_t lock;
        unsigned long nr_running, nr_switches;
         task_t *curr, *idle;
         prio_array_t *active, *expired, arrays[2];
        int prev_nr_running[NR_CPUS];
 } ____cacheline_aligned;

 static struct runqueue runqueues [NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned;

This is why my __per_cpu patch was invented 8)
Cheers,
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:30 EST