On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:07:55AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> Ok so the medicine is worse than the disease. I take it that you only want
> some key points made for rescheduling instead of the full preempt patch by
> Robert. That seems logical enough. The only issue i see is that for the
My ideal is to have the kernel to be as low worst latency as -preempt,
but without being preemptive. that's possible to achieve, I don't think
we're that far.
mean latency is another matter, but I personally don't mind about mean
latency and I much prefer to save cpu cycles instead.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:27 EST