On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:07, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Try "e2fsck -B 4096 -b 32768 <device>" instead.
I thought e2fsck was already trying the different superblocks present on the
device. Why isn't e2fsck smart enought to look for then ? Is this an
intended purpose ?
Why do you use the -B option ? How can it be useful to force the block size
? Especially if this one is different.
Thanx,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:26 EST