Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 22:11:22 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] DevFS support for /dev/cpu/X/(cpuid|msr)"
Previous message: Trever L. Adams: "Re: 2.2.20 vs 2.4.17 on 486 server"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> One way to do this would be to create a newbrk() syscall which takes a
> permission argument (for new pages.)

brk(), mmap().

Welcome to libc 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] DevFS support for /dev/cpu/X/(cpuid|msr)"
Previous message: Trever L. Adams: "Re: 2.2.20 vs 2.4.17 on 486 server"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:25 EST