On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 19:29, John Alvord wrote:
> The best part about planned preemption points is that there is minimal
> state to save when an interruption occurs.
Actually, both preempt-kernel and low-latency do about the same amount
of work re saving state.
With preempt-kernel, when a task is preempted in-kernel we AND a flag
value into the preempt count. That is all we need to keep track of
things.
With low-latency, the task state is set to TASK_RUNNING (which is a
precautionary measure). So it is about the same, although low-latency
(and lock-break) often also have to do various setup with the locks and
all.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:24 EST