Re: [orphan patch] 2.5.2-pre9 Assign syscall numbers for testing

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 01:08:36 EST

Next message: David Weinehall: "Re: Serial Driver Name Question (kernels 2.4.x)"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [orphan patch] 2.5.2-pre9 Assign syscall numbers for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:01:36PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:51:25 -0500,
> Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:50:21PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> >> I have sent this patch to Linus twice and got no reply. I don't have
> >> time to maintain it, this is now an orphan patch. If anybody wants it,
> >> they can have it.
> >
> >Do NOT apply this patch, it breaks forward compatibility assumptions.
>
> Read the patch.

It's still a vomituously gross numbers only thing that will cause nothing
but problems.

-ben

-- 
Fish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Weinehall: "Re: Serial Driver Name Question (kernels 2.4.x)"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [orphan patch] 2.5.2-pre9 Assign syscall numbers for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:21 EST