Re: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-C1: some results

• Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system"
• Previous message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix"
• In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-C1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> i've uploaded an updated O(1) scheduler patch, against 2.5.2-pre9:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-O1-2.5.2-C1.patch
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-O1-2.4.17-C1.patch
>
> only minimal fixes were added to the code, the goal is to reach a stable
> base.
>

Here is some comparaison I have made between vanilla -pre9 and Ingo's C1
patch
using parts of lmbench and variing background process CPU bounded.

Result in short: seems rock solid and really O(1)!

For imformation: running on PentiumII/400MHz 196Mb RAM uniprocessor
(alas!).

-- 
Luc Van Oostenryck

• application/octet-stream attachment: result-ctxt-2.5.2-pre9

• application/octet-stream attachment: result-ctxt-2.5.2-pre9-O1_C1

• application/octet-stream attachment: bench

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system"
• Previous message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix"
• In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-C1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:32 EST