Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers -> dontuse

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2002 - 09:53:04 EST

Next message: Stefan Frank: "[Oops]: Kernel 2.4.17: postfix startup crash, ksymoops output attached"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "[CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers (fixed)"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers (fixed)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Don't use the above patch please, there's a stupid oversight - it seems
super_block has a couple of fields *after* the fs-private union, and the new
code doesn't take that into account. The plan is:

a) get some sleep
b) then fix it

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stefan Frank: "[Oops]: Kernel 2.4.17: postfix startup crash, ksymoops output attached"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "[CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers (fixed)"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers (fixed)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:28 EST