Hi Andrew,
I tested 2.4.17 bare and got TLWOH (total Lockup Within One Hour)
So it is clear (for me at least) that the spinlock protection is _really_
needed.
I applied the 'Patch_for_ted' to 2.4.17 (without difficulty), build a new
kernel and I'm running it now. On 2.4.4 with the patch applied I got
uptime of 108 days when a power outage stopped the box.
regards
Kees
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> kees wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the beginning of last year I reported a solid freeze problem with Linux
> > when I moved from UP to SMP. Some bughunting especially with kdb an hints
> > from AM I was able to nail it down to some SMP unsafe irq table handling
> > in serial.c.
> > I submitted the attached patch to Ted but that never made it to the
> > kernel. It _really_ solved the problem as I had a crash sometimes within
> > 15 minutes and after applying it I reached uptimes over 100 days.
> >
>
> It looks like somebody has already had a go at fixing this in current
> kernels - the restore_flags() has been moved to the end of
> shutdown(). (It's not a complete fix, because request_irq() can
> schedule).
>
> Are you able to test 2.4.17?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:25 EST