Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:50:10 EST


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Ken Brownfield wrote:

> A) VM has major issues
> 1) about a dozen recent OOPS reports in VM code
> 2) VM falls down on large-memory machines with a
> high inode count (slocate/updatedb, i/dcache)
> 3) Memory allocation failures and OOM triggers
> even though caches remain full.
> 4) Other bugs fixed in -aa and others
> B) Live- and dead-locks that I'm seeing on all 2.4 production
> machines > 2.4.9, possibly related to A. But how will I
> ever find out?

I've spent ages trying to fix these bugs in the -ac kernel,
but they got all backed out in search of better performance.

Right now I'm developing a VM again, but I have no interest
at all in fixing the livelocks in the main kernel, they'll
just get removed again after a while.

If you want to test my VM stuff, you can get patches from
http://surriel.com/patches/ or direct access at the bitkeeper
tree on http://linuxvm.bkbits.net/

cheers,

Rik

-- 
Shortwave goes a long way:  irc.starchat.net  #swl

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:22 EST