On Wed, Jan 02 2002, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com> wrote:
>
> > Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 02 2002, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > While doing some stress testing on the 2.5.2-pre5 kernel, I am hitting
> > > > a kernel BUG at scsi_merge.c:83, followed by a kernel panic. The
> > > > problem is that scsi_alloc_sgtable fails because the request contains
> > > > too many physical segments. I think this patch is the correct fix:
> > >
> > > Correct, ll_rw_blk default is ok now. I missed this when killing
> > > scsi_malloc/scsi_dma, thanks.
> >
> > It turns out this is still not enough to fix the problem for me,
> > because ll_new_hw_segment is still allowing nr_phys_segments to become
> > too large. Is the following patch the correct way to deal with this
> > problem, or is that case supposed to be prevented by some other means?
> > At least, this patch prevents the kernel panic during my stress test.
>
> <snipped patches/>
>
> Peter,
> I was able to get a repeatable oops at that line copying
> files from /boot onto a "fake" scsi_debug disk with "pre5".
> The first largish file it attempted to copy caused the
> oops (which I sent to Jens).
>
> Anyway, I just applied your 2 patches (to scsi.c and ll_rw_blk.c)
> and the oops is no more.
I've included a slightly modified version, your logic was correct though
Peter. Thanks.
-- Jens Axboe- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:20 EST