Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 19:16:05 EST


On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:07:39PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:01:18PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Yes, but doesn't -ffreestanding imply that gcc _can't_ assume this is
> > the standard library...
>
> Ignore strcpy. Yes, that's what visibly causing a failure here,
> but the bug is in the funny pointer arithmetic. Leave that in
> there and the compiler _will_ bite your ass sooner or later.

Er, which part of the 'funny pointer arithmetic' ? I take it you aren't
a fan of the 'change to
memcpy(namep,RELOC("linux,phandle"),sizeof("linux,phandle"));' fix.
We need to do funny things here, and thus need a way to tell gcc to just
do what we're saying.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:19 EST