On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> trini@kernel.crashing.org said:
> > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE
>
> > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide?
>
> Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour
> can come later - that shouldn't be done at the same time as introducing CML2.
Yes, but what I was getting at was that these constraints will change
(either because they were incorrect or no longer aplicable).
Either way, why not fix bugs now? (since there are non-PCI/ISA ide,
which is why I kept that example to start with).
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:23 EST