On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:
> So that means that pretty much 100% of development to any one area is being
> done by one person?!? That's cool, but doesn't it limit the speed at which
> forward progress can be made?
The closest approximation my minds-eye can make of how things work
look something like this..
h h h h h
\ | | | /
m m m
\ |/
ttt
|
l
h - random j hacker working on same file/subsystem different goals
m - maintainer for file/subsys
t - "forked" tree maintainer (-ac, -dj, -aa etc..)
l - Linus
Whilst development happens concurrently in parallel, the notion of
progress is somewhat serialised as changes work their way down to
Linus.
(This whole thing goes a little astray when random j hacker sends
patches straight to Linus bypassing everyone else and they get
merged, but the controlled anarchy prevails and everyone somehow
gets back in sync).
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:21 EST