Re: [PATCH] rlimit_nproc

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Sat Dec 29 2001 - 14:12:33 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: State of the new config & build system"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "2.5.1-dj8"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] rlimit_nproc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > You of course need something like -2.4 and -2.5.
>
> Yes:
>
> linux-patches-2.0@kernel.org
> linux-patches-2.2@kernel.org
> linux-patches-2.4@kernel.org
> linux-patches-2.5@kernel.org
>
> Now... conventions for the subject line?

Subjects should be human-readable and descriptive. If they're going to
Linux-kernel, they should contain [patch]. I don't think you can
realistically ask for much more unless you put something behind it capable
of rejecting non-conformers.

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: State of the new config & build system"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "2.5.1-dj8"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] rlimit_nproc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:20 EST