Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 26 2001 - 10:04:40 EST


> Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small
> "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality).

Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM
fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most
embedded fanatic has.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:11 EST