Re: How to fix false positives on references to discarded text/data?

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2001 - 06:02:45 EST


On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:05:00 +0100 (CET),
Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
>According to my reading of the docs and also to my testing, .subsection 0
>and .previous should be equivalent here. But .subsection 0 may be cleaner.

As I read the gas info text, .subsection changes the current entry on
top of stack, it does not stack a new section/subsection pair.
.previous swaps the top of stack with the previous top of stack. I
suspect that you would get different results if there was more than one
section on the stack. In any case, .subsection 0 is "obviously correct".

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:09 EST