RE: conclusion: arp.c must be (still) defective

From: Alex (mail_ker@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at)
Date: Fri Dec 21 2001 - 13:54:37 EST

Next message: Hans-Christian Armingeon: "hunk patching net/Makefile in 2.4.17"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Configure.help editorial policy"
In reply to: Dana Lacoste: "RE: conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Dana Lacoste wrote:

> Moving to linux-net because it's more appropriate there, don't you think?

Dana : That depends! I think it might be a "thingie" between
isa-plugandplay and arp.c/netcode .... its a isa-plugandplaycard....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans-Christian Armingeon: "hunk patching net/Makefile in 2.4.17"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Configure.help editorial policy"
In reply to: Dana Lacoste: "RE: conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST