Re: aio

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 00:59:28 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: aio"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:57:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Then let us agree to disagree. :-) I think it's potential advantages,
> and how many things really "require it" for better performance, is
> being blown out of proportion.

Show me how to make a single process server that can handle 100000 or more
open tcp sockets that doesn't collapse under load. I can do it with aio;
can you do it without?

-ben

-- 
Fish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: aio"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: aio"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST