Re: aio

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 19:55:19 EST

Next message: Bill Huey: "Re: aio"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: nfsroot dead slow with redhat 7.2"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: aio"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: aio"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <3C213270.966DABFE@zip.com.au>
By author: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> The aio_* functions are part of POSIX and SUS, so merely reserving
> system call numbers for them does not seems a completely dumb
> thing to do, IMO.
>

Yes, it is, unless you already have a design for how to map the aio_*
library functions onto system calls.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Huey: "Re: aio"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: nfsroot dead slow with redhat 7.2"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: aio"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: aio"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST