Re: asynchronus multiprocessing

From: george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2001 - 13:18:04 EST

Next message: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky: "Re: IRC (was: Scheduler)"
Previous message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: The direction linux is taking"
In reply to: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Next in thread: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Reply: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Martin A. Brooks" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 15:40, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> > Has there been any talk of (or work on) AMP support in the kernel?
>
> I meant /asymmetric/ MP. Sorry.
>
I have heard of some work. As I understand it they are making an API
for cpu affinity. It is real time, so they are also interested in the
schedule routines around cpu affinity as well.

What did you have in mind?

-- 
George           george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky: "Re: IRC (was: Scheduler)"
Previous message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: The direction linux is taking"
In reply to: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Next in thread: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Reply: Martin A. Brooks: "Re: asynchronus multiprocessing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST