Re: More fun with fsx.

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 11:15:38 EST

Next message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: [patch] mempool-2.5.1-D2"
Previous message: Joe Wong: "compling kernel module against different kernel settings"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: More fun with fsx."
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: More fun with fsx."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:

> > Some kind of file locking problem?
> Is that supposed to work? That gives 2 programs messing with the same
> file 'test', but since the variable 'good_buf' is not shared, I'd
> expect failure.

*nod*, this is repeatable on all fs's, so it looks like a shortcoming
of fsx rather than a fs failure.

regards,
Dave.

-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: [patch] mempool-2.5.1-D2"
Previous message: Joe Wong: "compling kernel module against different kernel settings"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: More fun with fsx."
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: More fun with fsx."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:13 EST