Re: Is /dev/shm needed?

From: J Sloan (jjs@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 18:26:16 EST


Adam Schrotenboer wrote:

> On Sunday 16 December 2001 17:30, Robert Love wrote:
> > In other words, if you have memory to spare and the data ought to be
> > cached, Linux probably will cache it anyhow. On the other hand, if you
> > have lots of memory to spare, give it a try. Mount /tmp or all of /var
> > in tmpfs.
>
> Unfortunately, some(many?) distros are b0rken in re /var/. There is stuff put
> there that is needed across boots (for example, mandrake puts the DNS master
> files in /var/named.)

It's not just mandrake, it's all linux and in
fact that's where the named data wants to
live -

Not only dns info, but things like mail spool,
system logs, cron files -

And it's not just linux, it's pretty much a unix
thing in general -

Are you really sure you want to blow away
everyone's mail, all your dns records, cron
jobs etc if the system powers down?

cu

jjs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:00:12 EST