Hi Niels,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:02:33AM -0500, Niels Christiansen wrote:
>
> I'm wondering about the scope of this. My Ethernet adapter with, maybe, 20
> counter fields would have 20 counters allocated for each of my 16
> processors.
> The only way to get the total would be to use statctr_read() to merge them.
> Same for the who knows how many IP counters etc., etc.
Are you concerned with increase in memory used per counter Here? I suppose
that must not be that much of an issue for a 16 processor box....
>
> How many and which counters were converted for the test you refer to?
>
Well, I wrote a simple kernel module which just increments a shared global
counter a million times per processor in parallel, and compared it with
the statctr which would be incremented a million times per processor in
parallel..
> I do like the idea of a uniform access mechanism, though. It is well in
> line
> with my thoughts about an architected interface for topology and
> instrumentation
> so I'll definitely get back to you as I try to collect requirements.
>
> Niels
Hope we can come out with a really cool and acceptable interface..
Kiran
-- Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com> Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs, Bangalore. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST