Re: gcc vs intel's cc

• Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
• Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}"
• In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "gcc vs intel's cc"
• Next in thread: Martin Eriksson: "Re: gcc vs intel's cc"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
>
> roy

It's faster, but i read that it cannot compile the kernel yet.

François

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Which gcc version?"
• Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}"
• In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "gcc vs intel's cc"
• Next in thread: Martin Eriksson: "Re: gcc vs intel's cc"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:33 EST