Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?

From: Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Date: Fri Nov 23 2001 - 05:00:17 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] 2.4.15, PROC_CHANGE_PENALTY fix"
Previous message: William Park: "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Next in thread: Flavio Stanchina: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Jochen Striepe wrote:
>
> > I am *much* more irritated by:
> >
> > $ uname -r
> > 2.4.15-greased-turkey
>
> Would you really have preferred 2.4.15-sitting-duck ?

speedful-penguin ?

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] 2.4.15, PROC_CHANGE_PENALTY fix"
Previous message: William Park: "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Next in thread: Flavio Stanchina: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:33 EST