PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?

From: William Park (opengeometry@yahoo.ca)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2001 - 04:33:03 EST

Next message: rpjday: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [RFC] tree-based bootmem"
Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
Reply: Christian Bornträger : "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm confused by conflicting rumors about VIA 686B chipset:
- some people can get only 3 x DIMM working at PC-133.
- others report that all 4 x DIMM are working at PC-133.

It's interesting to note that specs for
- Tyan's motherboards say support for only 3 x DIMM at PC-133,
- Abit's motherboards say support for all 4 x DIMM at PC-133,
But, they both use same VIA 694X/686B chipsets.

Which is correct?

-- 
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>.
8 CPU cluster, NAS, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Tin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: rpjday: "Re: is 2.4.15 really available at www.kernel.org?"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [RFC] tree-based bootmem"
Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
Reply: Christian Bornträger : "Re: PC-133 RAM + VIA 686B -> 4 x DIMM or 3 x DIMM ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:32 EST