Hello!
> You are saying that the it is impossible for sock_alloc_send_skb() to
> fail when using non-blocking writes?
It is possible and normal provided frame is not fragmented.
And this is bug in nfsd if this happens with its frames.
> writes. (Note: by 'simultaneous' I mean that we don't wait for the
> server to reply before firing off the next request)
I do not understand, you have said you wait for write space yet. :-)
> I haven't done anything about this because IMHO it makes more sense to
> have the QDIO driver drop their special spinlock when calling external
> functions such as dev_kfree_skb_any()
It is pretty normal, if I understand your words correctly.
kfree_skb() is called under various kinds of locks in lots of places.
> rather than to force the RPC layer to use the spin_lock_irqsave().
I see no relation at all. Do it irqsave and nothing will change,
write_space is called only from softirqs.
It is bug in xprt level to grab spinlock which can cause deadlocks
inside write_space. Probably, I misunderstood you.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:23 EST