Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?

From: John Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 12:48:09 EST

Next message: Simon Kirby: "Re: VM-related Oops: 2.4.15pre1"
Previous message: vda: "Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature?"
In reply to: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Next in thread: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Reply: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

kernel 2.4.14, based off the same .config as 2.4.12 also exhibits the same
problem.

Making a more stripped 2.4.14 now, and will post results and .config in
the same directory as everything else.

-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Simon Kirby: "Re: VM-related Oops: 2.4.15pre1"
Previous message: vda: "Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature?"
In reply to: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Next in thread: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Reply: John Jasen: "Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST