Re: [PATCH] moving F0 0F bug check to bugs.h

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz)
Date: Sun Nov 18 2001 - 10:22:23 EST


On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Dave Jones wrote:

> - (unmaintained?) SGI visws support.
> - bootmem allocator.
> - CPU identification.
> - CPU feature enabling/disabling.
> - CPU errata workarounds.
>
> Whilst you get to know your way around the 3000 or so lines after hacking
> there a few times, it's constantly growing with each new CPU we support.
> I think it's going to come to a point where this has to be split up to
> some extent to keep it maintainable.

Indeed the whole setup.c is a bit confusing, a cpusetup.c file or somesuch
would make things a bit simpler with maybe an exported function to setup.c
in the nature of cpu_detect(...). In your 2.5 todo, are you going
to move the errata/bugs to the same cpusetup file or a seperate one? Cause
now that i look at it, we got errata (e.g. AMD T13) in setup.c f00f etc,
then popad and friends in bugs.h.

Thanks,
        Zwane Mwaikambo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST