> Something I'm curious on wrt to this new work. Would it make sense for
> these callbacks to get called before/after APM suspend as well as ACPI ?
> (I'm thinking of older pre-ACPI compliant boxes).
>
> Saving state of devices etc seems a logical thing to do.
Yes, it's entirely possible, and seems like a good thing to do.
The original motivation behind it was to replace struct pm_dev and the
callbacks for it. I haven't looked it into replacing them in the APM code
or the power management code for other architectures, but it shouldn't be
that painful. Hopefully.
-pat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:14 EST