Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Nov 12 2001 - 18:23:04 EST

Next message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "[CFT][PATCH] crc32 cleanups"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:59:05 +1100

(atomic_inc & atomic_dec_and_test for every packet, anyone?).

We already do pay that price, in skb_release_data() :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "[CFT][PATCH] crc32 cleanups"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:31 EST