ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 10:00:55 EST

Next message: Doug McNaught: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Previous message: D'Angelo Salvatore: "Re: nfsd"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Theodore Tso: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

What's coolest/best/worst of ext3, ReiserFS and XFS?
I just set up a RedHat 7.2 box with ext3, and after a few tests/chrashes,
I see no difference at all. After a chrash, it really wants to run fsck
anyway. I've tried ReiserFS before, with no fsck after chrashes - is this
because ReiserFS is better, or is it more like a hope-it's-ok-thinkig?
Then - last - How about XFS?

roy

-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA

Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Doug McNaught: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Previous message: D'Angelo Salvatore: "Re: nfsd"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Reply: Theodore Tso: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST