Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)"
• Previous message: Maksim Krasnyanskiy: "Re: 2.4.13-ac5 && vtun not working"
• Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13"
• Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Good morning Ben,

I just tried your test program with 2.4.13, 2 Gig, and it ran without
problems. Could you try that over there and see if you get the same result?
If it does run, the next move would be to check with 3.5 Gig.

Regards,

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)"
• Previous message: Maksim Krasnyanskiy: "Re: 2.4.13-ac5 && vtun not working"
• Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13"
• Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:45 EST