Re: Nasty suprise with uptime

From: Oden Eriksson (oden.eriksson@kvikkjokk.net)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 14:43:08 EST


On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.25, Matt Bernstein wrote:
> At 18:46 +1100 Neale Banks wrote:
> >> It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box
> >
> >You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?

I think this thread is pretty stupid..., who with a little common sense ever
treasure uptime? What's important is the total downtime..., and why...

I liked one idea that popped up here where one would use a random uptime...,
that would get ignorant people to be amazed and wonder how _that_ could
be....

-- 
Oden Eriksson

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:41 EST