Re: kernel compiler

From: J . A . Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Thu Oct 25 2001 - 17:00:31 EST

Next message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux Scheduler and Compilation"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "[PATCH] CPU history scheduler patch for 2.4.13 ..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel compiler"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: kernel compiler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 20011025 Alan Cox wrote:
>> GCC 3.0 Produces slower code, eh? I was of the understanding that it
>> contained many more optimizations than previous versions...???
>
>It does - but the end result right now is typically slower. it has the
>infrastructure and optimisation code to create faster code than 2.x ever
>could but it isnt yet at the point it has been refined to do so
>-

3.0.2 is out. Time to check it.

What I sure have seen is that code is much bigger than with 2.96. About 40k
for an 800k kernel.
Wil try with 14-pre1.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.14-pre1-beo #1 SMP Thu Oct 25 16:19:19 CEST 2001 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux Scheduler and Compilation"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "[PATCH] CPU history scheduler patch for 2.4.13 ..."
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel compiler"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: kernel compiler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:29 EST