Re: [PATCH] Separate CLONE_PARENT and CLONE_THREAD behavior

From: J . A . Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 19:10:21 EST


On 20011024 Dave McCracken wrote:
>
>Several versions back you added code that forces CLONE_PARENT behavior
>whenever CLONE_THREAD is specified. This unnecesarily forces a particular
>multi-threading model at the application level, and in fact breaks some
>ways of doing multi-threading.
>
>In particular, it requires that at least one task in an application *not*
>be part of the thread group, and that the pid returned by the original
>fork() can not be the thread group id itself.
>
>It would still be entirely possible to code an application or threading
>library in the way you envision by specifying CLONE_PARENT and CLONE_THREAD
>together. However, there's no good reason for forcing this model.
>
>A patch to remove that restriction is below.
>

Will this break current pthreads in glibc 2.2.4 ???

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.13-beo #2 SMP Thu Oct 25 00:59:08 CEST 2001 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:24 EST