Re: 2.4.13: some compilerwarnings...

• Next message: David Lang: "Re: VM"
• Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: RFC - tree quotas for Linux (2.4.12, ext2)"
• In reply to: Sven Vermeulen: "2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@rug.ac.be> wrote:

> {standard input}:1040: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> {standard input}:1125: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> {standard input}:1208: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'

I think Alan once mentioned that this was sort of a feature to make old
versions of binutils work too. I'm not sure exactly how old those are
though, and if they are older than the recommended 2.9.1.0.25 I vote for
fixing these ugly warnings.

-- 
André Dahlqvist <andre.dahlqvist@telia.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Lang: "Re: VM"
• Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: RFC - tree quotas for Linux (2.4.12, ext2)"
• In reply to: Sven Vermeulen: "2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.13: some compilerwarnings..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:21 EST