Re: Two suggestions (loop and owner's of linux tree)

From: Lukasz Trabinski (lukasz@wsisiz.edu.pl)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 10:04:07 EST

Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: linux-2.4.12 / linux-2.4.13 parallel port problem"
Previous message: Dave Garry: "Re: linux-2.4.12 / linux-2.4.13 parallel port problem"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Two suggestions (loop and owner's of linux tree)"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: Two suggestions (loop and owner's of linux tree)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
> >
> > I know about this option, but I think limit max=16 is much better.
>
> I disagree: presumably increasing the limit takes resources, in which case
> a fairly low default is best.

Not mounted loop devices too?

-- *[ Łukasz Trąbiński ]* SysAdmin @wsisiz.edu.pl

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: linux-2.4.12 / linux-2.4.13 parallel port problem"
Previous message: Dave Garry: "Re: linux-2.4.12 / linux-2.4.13 parallel port problem"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Two suggestions (loop and owner's of linux tree)"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: Two suggestions (loop and owner's of linux tree)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:21 EST