Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd

From: bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 14:54:47 EST

Next message: bill davidsen: "Re: More memory == better?"
Previous message: Marques Johansson: "2.4.12 not mounting root initrd with highmem 4G enabled (686)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <9r4c24$g2k$1@cesium.transmeta.com>,
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

| The right thing is to get rid of the old initrd compatibility cruft,
| but that's a 2.5 change.

Get rid of??? As long as you have some equivalent capability to get
the system up.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  His first management concern is not solving the problem, but covering
his ass. If he lived in the middle ages he'd wear his codpiece backward.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: bill davidsen: "Re: More memory == better?"
Previous message: Marques Johansson: "2.4.12 not mounting root initrd with highmem 4G enabled (686)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:40 EST