Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel

From: elko (elko@home.nl)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 10:13:31 EST


On Tuesday 23 October 2001 01:11, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 16:43, elko wrote:
> > My current conclusion: this combination of kernel and patches
> > is the most responsive I've ever used, normally, when I run
> > these command's, my systems would freeze to the point I had
> > to give them the VNP.
>
> Excellent. Give a lot of credit to Rik too because his VM work has
> relieved a lot of thrashing/storming in high-load situations such as
> yours.
> Robert Love

Hereby, I also give *a lot of* credit to Rik, by CC'ing him ;^)
(Hi Rik! No worries, I'm not from Vries <g>)

This system has not been running as smooth as now, since I switched
from 2.4.0 to 2.4.10-ac12 and a few days later to 2.4.12-ac3,
so I did some testing, that I could never complete with
the previous kernels I used (as was asked on the list).

I've attached the results of my latest tests..

-- 
ElkOS: 4:34pm up 1:05, 3 users, load average: 2.61, 2.58, 2.83
bofhX: Network failure -  call NBC



- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:38 EST