On Sundayen den 21 October 2001 23.52, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Normal users really don't need to see the startup message spam on boot,
> > unless there is an error (at which point it should be able to present
> > the error to the user). Any kind of of progress indicator' s really
>
> The big problem is making sure they then see the error, and the previous
> progress information. On a solid hang they might not get it
>
> > more for feedback that the boot is proceeding ok. The fact the boot
> > sequence isn't even interactive should also be a big hint that it isn't
> > really necessary (except for kernel and driver developers).
>
> You are thinking the small picture not the big one. If you are going to
> graphical in init then you want to make full use of the graphical
> environment to clearly show things like parallel fsck behaviour, what
> servers are starting up (with pretty icons) and to do interactive things
> like starting a rescue shell, going single user, pausing the boot,
> changing run level, interactive boot.
>
Gee, this sounds like Mandrake with candy like "Aurora" and "Linuxconf", I
prefer the old behaivour though :)
-- Oden Eriksson, Jokkmokk, Sweden. Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586, kernel 2.4.12-3mdk. Uptime: 18:17 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:28 EST