Re: Recursive deadlock on die_lock

From: Sam Varshavchik (
Date: Sun Oct 14 2001 - 20:55:20 EST

Keith Owens writes:

> On 14 Oct 2001 17:14:24 -0600,
> (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>>Keith Owens <> writes:
>>> IA64 also has PAL code which is
>>> called directly by the kernel, that PAL code has no unwind data so
>>> failures in PAL code result in bad or incomplete back traces.
>>PAL Ahh!!!!!
>>Please tell me that we are not rely on the firmware to be correct
>>after we have finished initializing the operating system.
>>Please tell me it ain't so. I have nightmares about that kind of setup.
> Not only do we rely on it, it is mandated by the IA64 design. Intel
> IA64 System Abstraction Layer, 24535901.pdf. The IA64 kernel calls SAL
> all over the place. grep -ir '\<[ps]al' include/asm-ia64/ arch/ia64/

Oh, goody! What an excellent way to shove CPRM or SSSCA down your throat!
The possibilities are endless...


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:56 EST