Re: cpus_allowed

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 11:23:18 EST

Next message: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: cpus_allowed"
In reply to: Rolf Fokkens: "cpus_allowed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Rolf Fokkens wrote:

> It resulted in some new curiosity: where's cpus_allowed initialized? I can
> only find an assignment to cpus_allowed for softirq's but no initialization
> for other processes. I assume the correct init value would be "0xffffffff" or
> -1. Can't find it though.

include/linux/sched.h: cpus_allowed: -1,

regards,

Dave.

-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: cpus_allowed"
In reply to: Rolf Fokkens: "cpus_allowed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:49 EST