Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 02:38:21 EST

Next message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: No love for the PPC"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Reply: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110120919130.31677-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> you
write:
> And hey, if you want to, feel free to create the regular
>
> #define read_barrier() rmb()
> #define write_barrier() wmb()
> #define memory_barrier() mb()

I agree... read_barrier_depends() then?

Rusty.

--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: No love for the PPC"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Reply: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:48 EST