Re: 2.4.11 loses sda9

Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 17:11:11 EST

> Right now we have a big and fairly nasty mix of the stuff that can be
> turned in pointer to block device, pointer to character device _and_
> stuff that is used as numbers.

Not really. I don't know whether you ever tried the experiment
and compiled kdev_t as a pointer to a struct with two members
namely major and minor, where the struct is allocated by MKDEV().
Very few places break, and these places are very easy to fix.
Stuff that is used as numbers can be forgotten quickly.
It is not difficult at all to get a kernel up and running that has
kdev_t a pointer type.

> Moreover, allocation policy for these structures is a tricky beast.

Yes. I entirely agree. All the rest is a mechanical action.
(Or, more precisely, removable modules require freeing, and
freeing requires refcounting. It is the refcounting that is
work, more than the allocation.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:42 EST