Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do?"
• Previous message: Stelian Pop: "Re: Sonypi driver?"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:03:37PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> I don't *like* making Alpha's wmb() stronger, but it is the
> only solution which doesn't touch common code.

It's not a "solution" at all. It's so heavy weight you'd be
much better off with locks. Just use the damned rmb_me_harder.

r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do?"
• Previous message: Stelian Pop: "Re: Sonypi driver?"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST